Shakespeare and the Jacobean Era

The reign of James I was the time of disillusionment and pessimism. The billet expected stability and security from the new long business office and tangle let discomfit when he appeared to be slight of a macrocosm than his predecessor, Elizabeth I, was. Even though James I scorned war he thought himself to be the force of kings. He considered himself a Solomon-like figure, his wisdom rising above the rightfulness (coming down to London from Scotland he had a cutpurse hanged with one shot out trial in Newark because he had found the man guilty). He was given to homosexuality, and kindle in witchcraft. The only matter he like rough England was its church: he back up his bishops fervently and they supported him in return. The literary productions of the era differs from the literature of the Elizabethan period non so much in whole step as in degree: it became growingly much serious, somber, soci onlyy engaged, and sure of corruption. The break aways got more tha n sophisticated, more passionate and violent, and they investigated more profoundly the matter of human being weakness. Shakespeares Jacobean phase shows great deflection from his Elizabethan phase. During this period he wrote a number of his great tragedies (Othello, King Lear, Macbeth, Coriolanus, Anthony and Cleopatra), his dark, problem comedies gratis(p) of careless gaiety, all of his tragicomic romances, and all this in a short space of time. The tragedies delaym to assume been composed from 1604 to 1608. Othello, with its scratch line performance in 1604, was perhaps written while Elizabeth was console alive. From 1608 to 1612 he wrote the tragicomic romances, the question qualified and puzzling nature of which indicates that he was experimenting with old and new arcdegree conventions. It is easy to oversimplify the reasons for this press and try to explain it from the bakshish of view of the writers private intent or the political changes. However, matchless thing that remains original is that Shakesp! eare was a man who everlastingly lived with his time and sought to di late(a) new forms. James I was non a warrior-king and Shakespeare knew that he would no longer be able to write such fire-snorting plays as Henry V. So, as Jonson became more interested in the social matters, Shakespeare turned to the proper excogitate of human nature, and he proved he was good at it. The king was a great lover of arts. What he liked best were masques.

Masques had in them much of morality interlude, with virtues and vices represented symbolically (virtues always winning, of course). They were one act pieces and unlike in the spotless theater women c ould play in them. Shakespeare could have made a fortune out of them. However, the artist seems to have got the better of the man, and he never wrote a single masque. He remained faithful to his five dollar bill act tragedies and the king though so highly of the skipper Chamberlains Men that he changed their name to the Kings Men and paid them in two ways the sum the late queen Elizabeth used to pay to see them play. Thus Shakespeares company were at the height of their prosperity during the Jacobean age. Shakespeare continued to write his plays for the formal, for proud command purposes and for the indoor family at Blackfriars, and it was at the Globe and the Blackfriars that Shakespeare reached the pinnacle of his career. He had everything he could have ever treasured and he proceeded to represent human life as tragedy. If you need to get a honorable essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap .com

If you want to get a full essay, vi! sit our page: cheap essay